Thursday 13 July 2017

'Banga Bhanga Hobena' is just an emotional Rhetoric : Constitution of India has provision to break or unite a Province

I hope many of you watched the The Stream debate last night (12/07/17). I have two concerns to share:

First, the anchor read the note of @MahuaMitra on behalf of TMC (Mamata Banerjee), West Bengal, which, as expected, reiterated that Darjeeling-Duars is integral part of WB and therefore, cannot be divided at any cost. Upendra Pradhan, rightly, countered the statement by declaring the statement as unconstitutional. There is provision in the Constitution of India to divide or unite a province/state based on relevant factors.
Moreover, it is important for the larger public to understand that Darjeeling-Duars was merged into West Bengal with secret works of the persons like BC Roy. The region was merged into West Bengal without any consultation with the Gorkhas, Adibasis and other people living in the area during early 1950s and against the will of the larger population residing in the region. You can read this whole political drama in the State Reorganisation Report (i guess it is online). Absorbed Area Act (1954) also sheds light on this. There was also a very strong lobby to form a state called 'Uttarakhand' consisting of Sikkim, Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri and Cooch-behar that eventually did not fructify.
Therefore, the very idea that Darjeeling-Duars is an integral part of West Bengal has no teeth. It is unfounded, illogical and just an emotional 'rethoric' as rightly highlighted by Swaraj Thapa in the debate yesterday. Therefore, where is the question of division of West Bengal? BC Roy and his team deceitfully merged the region into West Bengal without consulting the vulnerable, gullible, peace loving Gorkhas and Adibasis in the 1950s. Now we want to de-merge it from Bengal and have our own governance. It is as simple as that!
Secondly, my friend, Satya Brat, who also contributed to the debate said, among other things, 'the region is rich in bio-resources' but eventually suggested for 'Feasibility Study'. Now, we are not working so hard to undertake Railway, Hydro-Power or High Way projects that we shall undertake feasibility study.
One should understand, Darjeeling District alone roughly contributes over INR 2000 crore per annum to the state exchequer. We are yet to workout the revenue generated by Duars. Unlike Goa (the smallest state of India) that depends solely on tourism, the proposed Gorkhaland has diverse resource bases including Tea, Tourism, Forest, Water, Aesthetic Beauty, Culture, heritage, Border Trade and many more. Therefore, there is no question of 'Feasibility Study'. Once the Centre agrees (we are not concerned with the state), we will have referendum in disputed areas like Siliguri Terai and Jalpaiguri Duars and straightaway carve a new state!

Sunday 9 July 2017

Is Darjeeling a Killing Field for Centre and State Forces?

Seven (07) people have been killed in Gorkhaland (Darjeeling) so far during June 17 -July 10, 2017 and we do not know if this figure will go up with time. The Gorkhas are fighting for a separate State of Gorkhaland within India.

The first three were shot dead on June 17 when they were marching towards Patlebas located few kilometers away from Darjeeling Town. Security forces also resorted to violence in Kalimpong by open firing on the peaceful protestors on July 05, but no deaths were reported.  However, an unarmed Tashi Bhutia was shot in the midnight of July 07 while he was on this way home in Sonada after procuring medicine. The following day three more were shot dead. Two were killed while protesting the death of Tashi in the heart of Darjeeling Town and third shooting was made at Singmari area of the town reportedly without any valid reason. Many are in the hospitals fighting for their lives, we do not know how many of them will finally survive.

Reportedly, they are all killed by Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) jawans, a force maintained by the Government of India. A critical point to be noted here is that, all the victims were shot on their heads and were killed on the spot. West Bengal either through Gautam Deb or Mamata Banerjee herself has been repeatedly clarifying that the security personnel have not fired/shot at the protesters. In fact, when Aniket Chettri succumbed to his injury recently after his truck caught fire near Kalizora along NH10; TMC Minister Gautam Deb spent no time in accusing the Gorkhas for his death.

It is important for the larger public to understand that the Gorkha protest started peacefully, initially to oppose the imposition of Bengali Language as compulsory teaching in all the schools and later took a bigger form when the Gorkhas revived their 110 years old movement for the separate state of Gorkhaland. Violence actually started due the lathi charges and shooting of June 17 on the peaceful protestors by security forces and consequent death of the three Gorkhas. Therefore, who is the culprit here? Who is responsible for the subsequent violence that ravaged the entire hills of Gorkhaland (Darjeeling)?

My bigger concern, however, is: why are the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) jawans so excited to shoot? Why do they resort to violence when the protesters are unarmed and protesting peacefully? Who orders them to shoot? Why do they shoot only on the heads and not on other parts of the body? Is the state government via District Magistrate gives order to shoot or is it the larger and murkier ploy of the Central Government.

We really need to delve upon these questions, discuss them seriously and seek for the answers.


And lastly, if Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) shoots on its own without the order of the State or Central Government, let these jokers be sent to the borders. Let them replace the Gorkhas there. Let them fight the Pakistani terrorists. Let them fight the Chinese. Killing unarmed protesters doesn't make them security force. I don't think these cowards will stand more than 24 hours on the border!
------------------

Added on 12 July, 2017: One more (Ashok Tamang)  succumbed to bullet injuries on 11th morning making the total death to 08.


Monday 3 July 2017

Political Profile of Darjeeling District and Adjoining Duars

Look at the Political profile of Darjeeling. I may have missed here and there but this is by and large a rough political path traversed by Darjeeling and its neighbouring geographical milieu in the last three centuries.
Looking at this profile, do you think Darjeeling-Duars should be a part of West Bengal? Why should there should be any problem for the TMC led government of West Bengal to recognise and respect the Gorkhas' demand for a separate state of #Gorkhaland consisting of Darjeeling District (Kalimpong included) and the Duars region?

Prior to
1706:                The present district of Darjeeling was part of the Kingdom of Sikkim.

1706:                Kalimpong hills along with the adjoining Duars were annexed by Bhutan.

1800:                Darjeeling along with its adjoining hills (Kurseong) and adjacent Terai (Siliguri) was taken over by Nepal.

1835:                Darjeeling along with its adjoining hills (Kurseong) was ceded to British India.

1850:                The adjoining Terai (Siliguri) was taken over by British India and included in Jalpaiguri District

1865:                Kalimpong hills along with adjoining Duars were annexed by British India and included in Jalpaiguri district.

1866:                The hills of Kalimpong were included in Darjeeling district leaving the Duars
under Jalpaiguri district.

1880:                Siliguri was taken out from Jalpaiguri and included in Darjeeling district giving final shape to the Darjeeling district.

1905:                The district in the present shape (including KPG) was included in the Bhagalpur
of Bihar (Undivided Bengal).

1912:                The district was included in the Rajshahi (now in Bangladesh).


1947:                After the independence, the district was put under the state of West Bengal.


Therefore, 'banga bhanga hobena' has little logical meaning. 

Sunday 2 July 2017

Gorkhaland: Need of the hour

Critics/Detractors/Enemies of the separate state of #Gorkhaland have following three major reasons to argue against the division of West Bengal:

1) Small Geographical Area and Population of Darjeeling Region
This is one of the very important factors often debated in mainstream policy and academic circles against the formation of Gorkhaland. However, this argument is unfounded and has little rationality. Take a look at the figures of two smallest states of India.
Sikkim
Geographical Area: 7096 Sq KM
Population: 6.5 Lakh (2011)
Arable area: 11%
81% of the total geographical area of Sikkim is under Forest Department.
Goa
Geographical Area: 3702 Sq KM
Population: 18 Lakh (2011)
Proposed Gorkhaland (Dists of Darjeeling, Kalimpong and Bengal Dooars)
Geographical Area: 7217 Sq KM
Population: More than 40 Lakh (2011)
Arable land: over 50%
Are area and population, therefore, reason why #Gorkhaland should not be created?

2) Darjeeling is an integral part of West Bengal and there is no question of bifurcation
The Bengali politicians, journalists and even Bengali academics mostly throw this argument. Any conscious and informed citizen of India knows that Darjeeling along with its adjoining Dooars/Terai was never part of the larger political/administrative landscape of Bengal till mid 19th Century. Therefore, this theory has no relevance and can be challenged left, right and center!

3) Strategic location of Darjeeling Hills and National Security Concerns
This is the most important theory often put forth by the #Gorkhaland detractors both in New Delhi and Kolkata. However, this theory is also groundless and desperately propagated by the vested interests.
In fact, forcefully keeping Darjeeling-Dooars region with its unique history, socio-culture and economy within West Bengal posses serious national security threat to the country. The region is a melting pot of ethnic diversity. It is dynamic in nature and evolving with time. However, Bengal government in the last 60 years has systematically destroyed the dynamic socio-cultural, economic and political fabrics of the region by 1) resettling the Bangladeshi refugees in the region and 2) by massively encouraging illegal Bangladeshi migrants in North Bengal particularly in the Darjeeling-Dooars region.
The Report of Darjeeling Terai Settlement (1891) by Sasi Bhusan Dutt clearly highlights that there was not a single Bengali soul on the soil of Darjeeling Terai during the period.
Resettlement of Bangladeshi refugees and massive illegal migration in the strategically located Darjeeling-Dooars region in the last 60 years has seriously compromised the security of the nation as well as human security of the region.
Contrariwise, therefore, it is only after the separation from Bengal and formation of a separate state of #Gorkhaland that the security of the nation and the region can be truly ensured!
Mamata BanerjeeNarendra Modi PMO India : Now you say, why should there be no separate state of #GORKHALAND comprising of Darjeeling and Dooars region? What stops you from fulfilling the century long demands of the #Gorkhas of #Darjeeling and their brothers/sisters in #Dooars?

Demographic composition of Darjeeling Terai at the end of 19th Century:


Gorkha/Nepali:    26.9%


Lepcha:               3.0%


Bhutia:                1.1%


Others:               68.9% 

Bengali:              0.0%



.... and they say the #Gorkhas are migrants! ðŸ¤£

Separate state of Gorkhaland within India is not as big a thing as Bengalis might be thinking and trying to make

We should understand that a separate state within India is not as big a thing as we might be thinking and trying to make. Everything will remain the same. Only the governance will change.#Gorkhas are not taking the land anywhere!
We will all co-exist, walk together and work together. Adibasis, Bengalis, Marwaris, Biharis, Gorkhas, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and others will all benefit equally from the new state. We all know how the northern part of West Bengal has been neglected by the successive regimes over the years.
In fact, majority of us are open to change the name of the State and make it representative of all the inhabitants living in the new state. There is no hard and fast rule that it has to be called #Gorkhaland. We are also open with regard to the first chief minister....it can be a Bengali Chief Minister, a Rajbonshi, Lepcha, Bhutia, Marwari, Muslim or a Gorkha. It hardly matters to us.
Our Bengali friends in Siliguri and our friends in the adjoining Duars should understand this and extend their support to the movement. A new state in the region is a win-win situation for all!

Nationalism of the Gorkhas and Issues of Bangladeshi Infiltration into West Bengal

Gorkhas’ have submitted memorandums many times, in the last 40 years, to scrap Article 7 of the Indo-Nepal peace treaty (1950). It reads as follows: ‘The Governments of India and Nepal agree to grant, on a reciprocal basis, to the nationals of one country in the territories of the other the same privileges in the matter of residence, ownership of property, participation in trade and commerce, movement and other privileges of a similar nature’.
Indian Gorkhas have never been happy with Article 7 and, therefore, one of the main objectives, among others, of Gorkhaland Movement of the 1980s led by late Subash Ghishing was to scrap the Treaty.
This is the level of nationalism and loyalty of the Indian Gorkhas towards their country.
Now look at the case of West Bengal!
The Indo-Bangladesh border is a closed border and there is no free movement across. But if you look at the demographic trend of W. Bengal particularly in North Bengal in the last 70 years, you will be surprised!
The partition of the country led to large-scale resettlement of the Hindu Bengalis from Bangladesh in the region. That is absolutely fine. It was need of the time.
However, after the creation of Bangladesh in the early 1970s, there has been a large-scale illegal immigration of the Bangladeshis into the State of West Bengal often encouraged by the successive state governments! Ironically, Mamata Banerjee, recently, even threatened Mr Modi to dare touch a Bangladeshi let alone repatriating her/him to Bangladesh.
You will be surprised to know that the percentage share of Hill populace in Darjeeling district has continuously gone down over the years. The share was around 72% in 1951; it went down to 65% by 1961, 54% by 1981, and 49% by 2011. Actually, the hills populace largely represented by the Gorkhas, are fast becoming minority in the district. This is what figures in the successive Census of India reports indicate!
The citizens of the country need to understand this double standard of West Bengal for the larger national security interest of the Country. This is a grave concern for all of us and India needs to seriously think and debate on this.

We need to break West Bengal....that is the only solution

Today, Bengal is one of the most non-performing states in the country. Look at the outstanding debt of West Bengal in the last seven years as an initial pointer among many others.
2010-11: 185660.47 crore
2011-12: 208382.58 crore
2012-13: 226193.37 crore
2013-14: 250837.70 crore
2014-15: 274800.12 crore
2015-16: 304940.58 crore
2016-17: 334608.29 crore
WB has been one of the most inward looking states for the past several decades. There was time (during 1950s and 60s) when the state was ranked among one of the frontline states of the country. The past four decades have only seen downfall of the state. Today, situation has become so grave that WB has almost become a liability and a big burden to the country. I don’t think it is economically wise to maintain such huge debt-stricken province. The state has virtually become bankrupt! All likeminded people are running away from WB.
My suggestion to the Government of India: We need to break West Bengal into three smaller states for efficient handling of the economy. This also becomes important in the larger interest and aspiration of India to become a Global player in the near future.
1) North Bengal (Districts of Darj, Kpg, Jalpaiguri, Alipurduar, Coochbehar): Gorkhaland or Gorkha-Adibasi Pradesh
2) Central Bengal (Areas inhabited by our Surjapuri friends) as Surjapur
3) South Bengal (rest of Bengal) as Bengal.
The jargon/rethoric 'banga bhanga hobena' is just emotion laden term and will not serve the purpose of larger national interest.

Early Pathways of Sikkim University: Some Reflections

A decade down the line, since Sikkim University was declared established on July 02, 2007, I feel it was, as if, few days ago that we read news of establishment of a new Central University in Sikkim. Young and not so young academic minds located across spaces of the country but with deep association with the region were overjoyed by the news. It was, indeed, a proud moment for all us.
When I, incidentally, met the newly appointed Vice Chancellor on 14 July 2007 on the sidelines of the Council for Social Development’s training programme at State Institute of Rural Development (SIRD), Karfectar, he updated about the new university and the anticipated opportunities and challenges on its path. He further informed me that he was forming a team to undertake what he termed as a ‘University building Project’ and that he wanted dedicated young minds like me to join his team.
I was quite excited by the offer as it was, perhaps, the only opportunity for me to return back to the region from Delhi where I had been working as well as pursuing my PhD. I resigned from my employment at the Council for Social Development, New Delhi, by the end of July 2007 and was relieved to join Sikkim University on August 14, 2007. I joined the University on August 20, 2007
The Vice Chancellor had been operating from a room in the State Guest House since he joined SU in the first week of July. I was advised to occupy the adjacent room. Sikkim University functioned from the State Guest House for about 04 months. During the period, the State Guest House was Sikkim University as well as our residence. In the mean time, besides several other paper works, we pursued to the State government for an administrative office of the University and VC’s residence.
In September 2007, the government of Sikkim generously allocated the then Youth Hostel located at Samdur on rental basis to Sikkim University to start its initial administrative functions. We undertook minor repair works of the building and officially shifted to the present Administrative Block on November 01, 2007. The first set of executives, apart from Vice Chancellor and myself, joined the University on the same day. The first Registrar and Finance Officer joined the University in the second half of 2008 and the first Controller of Examinations joined in the autumn of 2009.
Having spent a relatively luxurious life in Delhi, the new settings in Gangtok were more difficult than I had initially anticipated. With the nocturnal habit of roaming around well beyond 12:00 at midnight across the campus of JNU, it was, initially, difficult for me to digest the fact that Gangtok goes to bed by 9:00 in the evening. Further, Sikkim University was declared only on paper without anything on the ground. We had to accompany the SU ACT (2006) to justify the existence of Sikkim University for all the official purposes. For example, we wanted new telephone connections. BSNL repeatedly asked for the valid documents to justify the address of Sikkim University. After pursuing for over a month we could finally convince BSNL for the first set of telephone connections in the University. Issues around basic facilities like inefficiency in photocopying, work culture, limited options of cheap food outlets were other forces that we had to be adapted with during the first few months in Gangtok. Some of the foundational exercises we undertook in the first one-year included:

i)    Preparation of a document on the status of higher education of Sikkim,
ii.)   Affiliation of all the colleges of Sikkim with Sikkim University,
iii.)  Designing of new curricula for undergraduate programmes of affiliated colleges,
iv.)  Developing the framework of semester system for Sikkim University and its affiliated colleges,
v.)   Evolving an evaluation pattern for Sikkim University, and
vi.)  Designing the Schools, Departments, and academic programmes of Sikkim University.

The first four academic departments that we decided to start were Social Systems & Anthropology (now Sociology), Microbiology, Peace and Conflict Studies and Management, and International Relations.
Till about mid-2010, I operated more like a multi-tasking staff member within the University. I coordinated examinations, monitored college affairs, purchased required university items, coordinated important meetings including ECs and ACs, shortlisted applications, coordinated research projects, drafted annual reports and also drafted important letters of the Vice Chancellor. One of the invited professors once jokingly remarked ‘you are the most qualified and decorated clerk of Sikkim University’ and I agreed to him.
Things became slightly smoother after the first set of permanent administrative staff joined the University in the latter half of 2010. In August 2010, I was transferred to the School of Policy Planning and Studies to coordinate research projects, teach and undertake other academic activities of the University. I joined as a permanent faculty member in the same school on 29 March 2012.
Looking back, I am happy that I got opportunity to be member of the founding team of Sikkim University. At a relatively young age, I was exposed to very many critical responsibilities of the University system particularly in academic administration and examinations. The whole process was a lifetime learning experience for me. I used to feel elated when members of affiliated colleges during their routine visit to the university said ‘we know only two persons in Sikkim University: Lama Sir and Khawas Sir’. These words have no meaning as of today but they used to galvanize me to work harder and longer.
Sikkim University started with two members with its office at the State Guest House (Gangtok) and gradually grew from strength to strength. The first five years were rather harsher, more unorganized and less institutionalized than the last five years. We had no office timings and used to work well beyond the official 5:30 pm and sometimes till 11:00 pm. Establishing an institution of higher learning is a far difficult proposition than what many detractors may perceive from outside. I feel honoured, fortunate and so proud that I was part of the Sikkim University building process.
May SIKKIM UNIVERSITY enlighten the world for thousands of years to come!

Citizen Amendment Bill (CAB), 2019 and Darjeeling region

Citizen Amendment Bill (CAB),  2019 and Darjeeling Region With an area of just 3149 sq km and population of over 21 lakh, 3/4th of Darj...